↓ Skip to main content

Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adult, non-pregnant persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
35 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adult, non-pregnant persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Birgit Fullerton, Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Thomas Semlitsch, Andrea Berghold, Ferdinand M Gerlach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#533,424
of 14,148,619 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,579
of 10,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,676
of 369,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,148,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.