You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James M. McFarland, Yuwei Cui, Daniel A. Butts |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Belarus | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 189 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 31% |
| Researcher | 48 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 61 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 24% |
| Engineering | 23 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,427,456
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,026
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,137
of 208,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#49
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.