You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neoantigen vaccine generates intratumoral T cell responses in phase Ib glioblastoma trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0792-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derin B. Keskin, Annabelle J. Anandappa, Jing Sun, Itay Tirosh, Nathan D. Mathewson, Shuqiang Li, Giacomo Oliveira, Anita Giobbie-Hurder, Kristen Felt, Evisa Gjini, Sachet A. Shukla, Zhuting Hu, Letitia Li, Phuong M. Le, Rosa L. Allesøe, Alyssa R. Richman, Monika S. Kowalczyk, Sara Abdelrahman, Jack E. Geduldig, Sarah Charbonneau, Kristine Pelton, J. Bryan Iorgulescu, Liudmila Elagina, Wandi Zhang, Oriol Olive, Christine McCluskey, Lars R. Olsen, Jonathan Stevens, William J. Lane, Andres M. Salazar, Heather Daley, Patrick Y. Wen, E. Antonio Chiocca, Maegan Harden, Niall J. Lennon, Stacey Gabriel, Gad Getz, Eric S. Lander, Aviv Regev, Jerome Ritz, Donna Neuberg, Scott J. Rodig, Keith L. Ligon, Mario L. Suvà, Kai W. Wucherpfennig, Nir Hacohen, Edward F. Fritsch, Kenneth J. Livak, Patrick A. Ott, Catherine J. Wu, David A. Reardon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 251 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 89 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 7% |
| Canada | 11 | 4% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 89 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 134 | 53% |
| Scientists | 89 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,050 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1050 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 179 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 178 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 97 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 94 | 9% |
| Other | 59 | 6% |
| Other | 134 | 13% |
| Unknown | 309 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 192 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 140 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 8% |
| Engineering | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 133 | 13% |
| Unknown | 342 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#185,397
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,177
of 99,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,727
of 446,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#246
of 977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.