You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feedback interactions between needle litter decomposition and rhizosphere activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-004-1540-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jens-Arne Subke, Volker Hahn, Giovanna Battipaglia, Sune Linder, Nina Buchmann, M. Francesca Cotrufo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 73 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,993
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,675
of 66,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.