You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
CHIP: A Co-chaperone for Degradation by the Proteasome
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
The Networking of Chaperones by Co-chaperones
|
| Published in |
Sub cellular biochemistry, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-11731-7_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-911730-0, 978-3-31-911731-7
|
| Authors |
Adrienne L. Edkins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,688,606
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#56
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,568
of 263,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.