↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Philosophical Reflection on Feminist Philosophies of Science

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Measuring the Value of Women: A Feminist Analysis of Economic Categories and Thought
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measuring the Value of Women: A Feminist Analysis of Economic Categories and Thought
Chapter number 10
Book title
Meta-Philosophical Reflection on Feminist Philosophies of Science
Published in
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26348-9_10
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-926346-5, 978-3-31-926348-9
Authors

Ruth Hagengruber

Editors

Maria Cristina Amoretti, Nicla Vassallo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,771,495
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,413
of 398,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them