↓ Skip to main content

Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007923.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Dentice, Mark Elkins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 23%
Student > Bachelor 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 47%
Unspecified 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#10,018,894
of 13,104,802 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,341
of 10,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,682
of 319,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,104,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.