↓ Skip to main content

Pre-Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Nanoemulsion-Based Hepatitis B Mucosal Vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Nanoemulsion-Based Hepatitis B Mucosal Vaccine
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002954
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul E. Makidon, Anna U. Bielinska, Shraddha S. Nigavekar, Katarzyna W. Janczak, Jessica Knowlton, Alison J. Scott, Nicholas Mank, Zhengyi Cao, Sivaprakash Rathinavelu, Michael R. Beer, J. Erby Wilkinson, Luz P. Blanco, Jeffrey J. Landers, James R. Baker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,743,716
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,421
of 194,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,535
of 82,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#66
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.