You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In the Dance Studio: An Art and Engineering Exploration of Human Flocking
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Controls and Art
|
| Published in |
arXiv, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-03904-6_2 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-903903-9, 978-3-31-903904-6
|
| Authors |
Naomi E. Leonard, George F. Young, Kelsey Hochgraf, Daniel T. Swain, Aaron Trippe, Willa Chen, Katherine Fitch, Susan Marshall |
| Editors |
Amy LaViers, Magnus Egerstedt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Belize | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 39% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 28% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,517,269
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#97,072
of 942,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,514
of 321,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#555
of 10,272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942,654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10,272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.