↓ Skip to main content

Testing the use of bulk organic δ13C, δ15N, and Corg:Ntot ratios to estimate subsidence during the 1964 great Alaska earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing the use of bulk organic δ13C, δ15N, and Corg:Ntot ratios to estimate subsidence during the 1964 great Alaska earthquake
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.09.031
Authors

Adrian M. Bender, Robert C. Witter, Matthew Rogers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 70%
Environmental Science 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,690,435
of 11,838,392 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#639
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,458
of 345,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,838,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.