↓ Skip to main content

Mining Social Networks and Security Informatics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Learning to Detect Vandalism in Social Content Systems: A Study on Wikipedia
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Learning to Detect Vandalism in Social Content Systems: A Study on Wikipedia
Chapter number 11
Book title
Mining Social Networks and Security Informatics
Published in
ADS, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6359-3_11
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-076358-6, 978-9-40-076359-3
Authors

Sara Javanmardi, David W. McDonald, Rich Caruana, Sholeh Forouzan, Cristina V. Lopes, Javanmardi, Sara, McDonald, David W., Caruana, Rich, Forouzan, Sholeh, Lopes, Cristina V.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#28,292
of 37,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,181
of 282,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#407
of 562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.