You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computational Analysis of Phosphopeptide Binding to the Polo-Box Domain of the Mitotic Kinase PLK1 Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000880 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Huggins, Grahame J. McKenzie, Daniel D. Robinson, Ana J. Narváez, Bryn Hardwick, Meredith Roberts-Thomson, Ashok R. Venkitaraman, Guy H. Grant, Mike C. Payne |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,457,934
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,158
of 8,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,528
of 104,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#21
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.