↓ Skip to main content

Spike Avalanches Exhibit Universal Dynamics across the Sleep-Wake Cycle

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spike Avalanches Exhibit Universal Dynamics across the Sleep-Wake Cycle
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiago L. Ribeiro, Mauro Copelli, Fábio Caixeta, Hindiael Belchior, Dante R. Chialvo, Miguel A. L. Nicolelis, Sidarta Ribeiro

Abstract

Scale-invariant neuronal avalanches have been observed in cell cultures and slices as well as anesthetized and awake brains, suggesting that the brain operates near criticality, i.e. within a narrow margin between avalanche propagation and extinction. In theory, criticality provides many desirable features for the behaving brain, optimizing computational capabilities, information transmission, sensitivity to sensory stimuli and size of memory repertoires. However, a thorough characterization of neuronal avalanches in freely-behaving (FB) animals is still missing, thus raising doubts about their relevance for brain function.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 2%
France 3 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 185 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 24%
Researcher 44 22%
Student > Master 26 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 54 26%
Physics and Astronomy 40 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 10%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 27 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2011.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,823
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,880
of 179,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#788
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.