You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discovering Motifs in Ranked Lists of DNA Sequences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eran Eden, Doron Lipson, Sivan Yogev, Zohar Yakhini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 498 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 156 | 29% |
| Researcher | 97 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 75 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 208 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 121 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,310,838
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,007
of 9,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,350
of 95,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.