↓ Skip to main content

Species-Specific Differences in the Expression of the HNF1A, HNF1B and HNF4A Genes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species-Specific Differences in the Expression of the HNF1A, HNF1B and HNF4A Genes
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorna W. Harries, James E. Brown, Anna L. Gloyn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 29%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Chemistry 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#118,148
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,335
of 101,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#292
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.