↓ Skip to main content

Insulin gene mutations as a cause of permanent neonatal diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
331 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Insulin gene mutations as a cause of permanent neonatal diabetes
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2007
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0707291104
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Stoy, E. L. Edghill, S. E. Flanagan, H. Ye, V. P. Paz, A. Pluzhnikov, J. E. Below, M. G. Hayes, N. J. Cox, G. M. Lipkind, R. B. Lipton, S. A. W. Greeley, A.-M. Patch, S. Ellard, D. F. Steiner, A. T. Hattersley, L. H. Philipson, G. I. Bell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Chile 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 124 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 22%
Unspecified 10 7%
Chemistry 6 4%
Other 12 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2013.
All research outputs
#1,235,678
of 9,623,359 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,958
of 52,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,489
of 342,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#508
of 1,102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,623,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.