You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The (mis)classification of chemo-fog – methodological inconsistencies in the investigation of cognitive impairment after chemotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-005-9055-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Val Shilling, Valerie Jenkins, Ivonne Solis Trapala |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,656
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,874
of 60,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#17
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.