You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two Chikungunya Isolates from the Outbreak of La Reunion (Indian Ocean) Exhibit Different Patterns of Infection in the Mosquito, Aedes albopictus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Vazeille, Sara Moutailler, Daniel Coudrier, Claudine Rousseaux, Huot Khun, Michel Huerre, Julien Thiria, Jean-Sébastien Dehecq, Didier Fontenille, Isabelle Schuffenecker, Philippe Despres, Anna-Bella Failloux |
| Abstract |
A Chikungunya (CHIK) outbreak hit La Réunion Island in 2005-2006. The implicated vector was Aedes albopictus. Here, we present the first study on the susceptibility of Ae. albopictus populations to sympatric CHIKV isolates from La Réunion Island and compare it to other virus/vector combinations. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Madagascar | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Réunion | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| French Polynesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 341 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 70 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 130 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 33 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,026,460
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,590
of 205,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,479
of 78,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#30
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.