You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-018-0302-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John A. Morris, John P. Kemp, Scott E. Youlten, Laetitia Laurent, John G. Logan, Ryan C. Chai, Nicholas A. Vulpescu, Vincenzo Forgetta, Aaron Kleinman, Sindhu T. Mohanty, C. Marcelo Sergio, Julian Quinn, Loan Nguyen-Yamamoto, Aimee-Lee Luco, Jinchu Vijay, Marie-Michelle Simon, Albena Pramatarova, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Katerina Trajanoska, Elena J. Ghirardello, Natalie C. Butterfield, Katharine F. Curry, Victoria D. Leitch, Penny C. Sparkes, Anne-Tounsia Adoum, Naila S. Mannan, Davide S. K. Komla-Ebri, Andrea S. Pollard, Hannah F. Dewhurst, Thomas A. D. Hassall, Michael-John G. Beltejar, Douglas J. Adams, Suzanne M. Vaillancourt, Stephen Kaptoge, Paul Baldock, Cyrus Cooper, Jonathan Reeve, Evangelia E. Ntzani, Evangelos Evangelou, Claes Ohlsson, David Karasik, Fernando Rivadeneira, Douglas P. Kiel, Jonathan H. Tobias, Celia L. Gregson, Nicholas C. Harvey, Elin Grundberg, David Goltzman, David J. Adams, Christopher J. Lelliott, David A. Hinds, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Matthew T. Maurano, Peter I. Croucher, Graham R. Williams, J. H. Duncan Bassett, David M. Evans, J. Brent Richards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 16% |
| Canada | 8 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 56% |
| Scientists | 38 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 316 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 21% |
| Researcher | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 80 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 3% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 12% |
| Unknown | 98 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#244,961
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#412
of 7,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,213
of 448,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.