You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evolutionary constraints on species diversity in marine bacterioplankton communities
|
---|---|
Published in |
The ISME Journal, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41396-018-0336-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hsiao-Pei Lu, Yi-Chun Yeh, Fuh-Kwo Shiah, Gwo-Ching Gong, Chih-Hao Hsieh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Taiwan | 1 | 7% |
Japan | 1 | 7% |
Mexico | 1 | 7% |
Sweden | 1 | 7% |
China | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 26% |
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 16% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,726,974
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#1,450
of 3,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,842
of 446,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#39
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.