↓ Skip to main content

Climate Change, Coral Loss, and the Curious Case of the Parrotfish Paradigm: Why Don't Marine Protected Areas Improve Reef Resilience?

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Marine Science, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
714 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Climate Change, Coral Loss, and the Curious Case of the Parrotfish Paradigm: Why Don't Marine Protected Areas Improve Reef Resilience?
Published in
Annual Review of Marine Science, January 2019
DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095300
Pubmed ID
Authors

John F Bruno, Isabelle M Côté, Lauren T Toth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 714 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 714 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 110 15%
Student > Bachelor 101 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 14%
Researcher 94 13%
Other 31 4%
Other 85 12%
Unknown 194 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 194 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 3%
Unspecified 10 1%
Other 66 9%
Unknown 220 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,871,320
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Marine Science
#82
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,023
of 449,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Marine Science
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.