↓ Skip to main content

Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013094.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Sereda, Jun Xia, Amr El Refaie, Deborah A Hall, Derek J Hoare

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 25%
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 21%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 29 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#354,090
of 15,220,640 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#853
of 11,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,002
of 380,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,220,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.