You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013094.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Magdalena Sereda, Jun Xia, Amr El Refaie, Deborah A Hall, Derek J Hoare |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 7% |
France | 2 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 373 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 66 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
Researcher | 42 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 4% |
Other | 35 | 9% |
Unknown | 141 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 14% |
Psychology | 27 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 13 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
Other | 43 | 12% |
Unknown | 158 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#618,179
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,109
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,761
of 448,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.