↓ Skip to main content

Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013094.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Sereda, Jun Xia, Amr El Refaie, Deborah A Hall, Derek J Hoare

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 23%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 21%
Psychology 12 7%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 48 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#419,156
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#932
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,391
of 393,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.