↓ Skip to main content

Early discontinuation of antibiotics for febrile neutropenia versus continuation until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early discontinuation of antibiotics for febrile neutropenia versus continuation until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012184.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anat Stern, Elena Carrara, Roni Bitterman, Dafna Yahav, Leonard Leibovici, Mical Paul

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Other 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#712,125
of 15,168,919 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,066
of 11,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,384
of 379,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,168,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.