↓ Skip to main content

Plant Genome Editing with CRISPR Systems

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Genome Editing with CRISPR Systems'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Plant DNA Repair Pathways and Their Applications in Genome Engineering
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Rapid Screening of CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Mutants Using the ACT-PCR Method
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Decoding Sanger Sequencing Chromatograms from CRISPR-Induced Mutations
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Creating Large Chromosomal Deletions in Rice Using CRISPR/Cas9
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 Editing System Based on the Endogenous tRNA Processing
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Single Transcript CRISPR-Cas9 System for Multiplex Genome Editing in Plants
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 CRISPR-Act2.0: An Improved Multiplexed System for Plant Transcriptional Activation
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Generating Photoperiod-Sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with CRISPR/Cas9
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Knocking Out MicroRNA Genes in Rice with CRISPR-Cas9
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 An Agrobacterium-Mediated CRISPR/Cas9 Platform for Genome Editing in Maize
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Fluorescence Marker-Assisted Isolation of Cas9-Free and CRISPR-Edited Arabidopsis Plants
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Creating Targeted Gene Knockouts in Brassica oleracea Using CRISPR/Cas9
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Application of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Tomato
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Genome Editing in Potato with CRISPR/Cas9
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Visual Assay for Gene Editing Using a CRISPR/Cas9 System in Carrot Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Genome Editing in Soybean with CRISPR/Cas9
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Genome Editing in Citrus Tree with CRISPR/Cas9
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Plant Gene Knockout and Knockdown by CRISPR-Cpf1 (Cas12a) Systems
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Editing a Stomatal Developmental Gene in Rice with CRISPR/Cpf1
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Targeted Mutagenesis Using FnCpf1 in Tobacco
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Gene Replacement by Intron Targeting with CRISPR-Cas9
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Targeted Base Editing with CRISPR-Deaminase in Tomato
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Virus-Mediated Genome Editing in Plants Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Biolistic Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 with Ribonucleoprotein Complex in Wheat
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 DNA-Free Genome Editing via Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) Delivery of CRISPR/Cas in Lettuce
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 An Automated Protoplast Transformation System
Attention for Chapter 14: Genome Editing in Potato with CRISPR/Cas9
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Genome Editing in Potato with CRISPR/Cas9
Chapter number 14
Book title
Plant Genome Editing with CRISPR Systems
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8991-1_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8990-4, 978-1-4939-8991-1
Authors

Satya Swathi Nadakuduti, Colby G. Starker, Daniel F. Voytas, C. Robin Buell, David S. Douches, Nadakuduti, Satya Swathi, Starker, Colby G., Voytas, Daniel F., Buell, C. Robin, Douches, David S.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,635,180
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,679
of 13,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,951
of 435,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.