You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Meta-analysis of Brief Personalized Feedback Interventions for Problematic Gambling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-018-09818-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel C. Peter, Emma I. Brett, Matthew T. Suda, Eleanor L. S. Leavens, Mary Beth Miller, Thad R. Leffingwell, James P. Whelan, Andrew W. Meyers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,209,370
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#327
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,354
of 445,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.