You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative mouse lung injury by nickel nanoparticles with differential surface modification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-018-0436-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yiqun Mo, Mizu Jiang, Yue Zhang, Rong Wan, Jing Li, Chuan-Jian Zhong, Huangyuan Li, Shichuan Tang, Qunwei Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#335
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,781
of 451,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.