The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of the Intercultural Diabetes Online Community Research Council: Codesign and Social Media Processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1932296818818455 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah A. Greenwood, Michelle L. Litchman, Ashley H. Ng, Perry M. Gee, Heather M. Young, Mila Ferrer, Jimmy Ferrer, Chris E. Memering, Barbara Eichorst, Renza Scibilia, Lisa M. S. Miller |
| Abstract |
This case study describes the formation of the Intercultural Diabetes Online Community Research council (iDOCr) and community advisory board (CAB) to engage the diabetes community and researchers in the codesign of community-based participatory research (CBPR) to examine online peer support in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Social media engagement was the foundation for CBPR knowledge generation. During the project, the iDOCr council and CAB (n = 27) met quarterly via video conferencing and three times in person during national diabetes meetings. Data from four Twitter chats were used to explore the usefulness and utility of Twitter data to learn about concerns and priorities of the diabetes online community (DOC) and supported the evolution of iDOCr, the development of a research question and the design of a CBPR study. The iDOCr project (1) created a diverse CAB; (2) raised awareness of iDOCr and online peer support, which resulted in support and trust from key opinion leaders within the DOC to enable future partnerships for research and funding; (3) engaged with English- and Spanish-speaking DOC users through social media; and (4) designed a CBPR study supported by Twitter chat data analyses. Integrating the voice of people with diabetes (PWD) and the DOC in designing CBPR, through use of a CAB, ensures the most important and relevant research questions are asked. Additional research focused on online peer support may increase health care provider confidence in referring PWD to this low-cost and relatively accessible resource with the potential power to advance health. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 50% |
| Australia | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,115,406
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
#290
of 1,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,800
of 447,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.