You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacogenomics of Interferon-ß Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Baseline IFN Signature Determines Pharmacological Differences between Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa G. M. van Baarsen, Saskia Vosslamber, Marianne Tijssen, Josefien M. C. Baggen, Laura F. van der Voort, Joep Killestein, Tineke C. T. M. van der Pouw Kraan, Chris H. Polman, Cornelis L. Verweij |
| Abstract |
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous disease. In order to understand the partial responsiveness to IFNbeta in Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS) we studied the pharmacological effects of IFNbeta therapy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,443,598
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,433
of 216,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,866
of 91,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#92
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.