You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Evaluation of point of care tests for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Suriname
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2019
Henk D. F. H. Schallig, Ricardo V. P. Hu, Alida D. Kent, Merlin van Loenen, Sandra Menting, Albert Picado, Zippora Oosterling, Israel Cruz
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||12||80%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||11%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||5||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||8%|
|Student > Master||5||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||18%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||9||15%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||11%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||5||8%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,668,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 7,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 440,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,668,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.