↓ Skip to main content

アナフィラキシーショックを呈したライチによる口腔アレルギー症候群の1成人例

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Showa University Society, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 118)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アナフィラキシーショックを呈したライチによる口腔アレルギー症候群の1成人例
Published in
Journal of The Showa University Society, September 2010
DOI 10.14930/jsma1939.68.280
Authors

鈴木 慎太郎, 茂木 健太郎, 家城 光志, 黒川 真嗣, 足立 満

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,261,002
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Showa University Society
#25
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,347
of 107,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Showa University Society
#7
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.