You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enset in Ethiopia: a poorly characterized but resilient starch staple
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcy214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James S Borrell, Manosh K Biswas, Mark Goodwin, Guy Blomme, Trude Schwarzacher, J S Pat Heslop-Harrison, Abebe M Wendawek, Admas Berhanu, Simon Kallow, Steven Janssens, Ermias L Molla, Aaron P Davis, Feleke Woldeyes, Kathy Willis, Sebsebe Demissew, Paul Wilkin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 68% |
| Scientists | 11 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 105 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#651,690
of 25,994,718 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#52
of 3,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,939
of 450,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,994,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.