↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Appearance-Based Trait Inferences for Male and Female Political Candidates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Differences in Appearance-Based Trait Inferences for Male and Female Political Candidates
Published in
Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, November 2018
DOI 10.1080/1554477x.2018.1506206
Authors

Tessa Ditonto, Kyle Mattes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,089,278
of 13,526,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Women, Politics & Policy
#98
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,474
of 340,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Women, Politics & Policy
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,526,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.