↓ Skip to main content

Neandertal foot remains from Regourdou 1 (Montignac-sur-Vézère, Dordogne, France)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Evolution, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neandertal foot remains from Regourdou 1 (Montignac-sur-Vézère, Dordogne, France)
Published in
Journal of Human Evolution, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.11.003
Authors

Adrián Pablos, Asier Gómez-Olivencia, Bruno Maureille, Trenton W. Holliday, Stéphane Madelaine, Erik Trinkaus, Christine Couture-Veschambre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#479,749
of 12,388,084 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#193
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,005
of 178,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,388,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.