You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Selection biases and spillovers from collective conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aafc83 |
Authors |
Renzo Giudice, Jan Börner, Sven Wunder, Elias Cisneros |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Peru | 2 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Finland | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
Scientists | 8 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 26 | 29% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 29 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#667,892
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#958
of 6,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,102
of 366,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#21
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.