The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
How Australian wildlife spread and suppress Ross River virus
|
---|---|
Published by |
The Conversation, January 2019
|
Authors |
Cameron Webb, Eloise Stephenson, Emily Johnston Flies, Eloise Skinner |
Abstract |
Thousands of Australians contract Ross River virus each year. Mozzies can infect us with their bites, but only after they've bitten an infected animal host. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 33 | 42% |
United States | 6 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
Curaçao | 2 | 3% |
Ghana | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 56 | 71% |
Scientists | 17 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#179,711
of 26,533,029 outputs
Outputs from The Conversation
#19,341
of 196,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,670
of 452,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Conversation
#433
of 5,276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,533,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.