↓ Skip to main content

Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle
Published in
Microbiome, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40168-019-0618-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fuyong Li, Thomas C. A. Hitch, Yanhong Chen, Christopher J. Creevey, Le Luo Guan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 34 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,099,452
of 16,027,585 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#418
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,310
of 441,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#112
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,027,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.