↓ Skip to main content

Conceptualizing Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: If You Remove It, What's to Come?

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
65 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conceptualizing Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: If You Remove It, What's to Come?
Published in
BioScience, January 2019
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biy152
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Ryan Bellmore, George R Pess, Jeffrey J Duda, Jim E O’Connor, Amy E East, Melissa M Foley, Andrew C Wilcox, Jon J Major, Patrick B Shafroth, Sarah A Morley, Christopher S Magirl, Chauncey W Anderson, James E Evans, Christian E Torgersen, laura S Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Professor 7 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 22%
Engineering 10 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 47 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#399,101
of 20,792,815 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#182
of 2,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,244
of 473,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#8
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,792,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.