↓ Skip to main content

Conceptualizing Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: If You Remove It, What's to Come?

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
67 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conceptualizing Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: If You Remove It, What's to Come?
Published in
BioScience, January 2019
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biy152
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Ryan Bellmore, George R Pess, Jeffrey J Duda, Jim E O’Connor, Amy E East, Melissa M Foley, Andrew C Wilcox, Jon J Major, Patrick B Shafroth, Sarah A Morley, Christopher S Magirl, Chauncey W Anderson, James E Evans, Christian E Torgersen, laura S Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 42%
Unspecified 2 17%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#249,366
of 12,690,167 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#105
of 2,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,751
of 320,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,690,167 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.