↓ Skip to main content

Epigenotyping in Peripheral Blood Cell DNA and Breast Cancer Risk: A Proof of Principle Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
25 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenotyping in Peripheral Blood Cell DNA and Breast Cancer Risk: A Proof of Principle Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Widschwendter, Sophia Apostolidou, Elke Raum, Dietrich Rothenbacher, Heidi Fiegl, Usha Menon, Christa Stegmaier, Ian J. Jacobs, Hermann Brenner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,795,779
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,993
of 197,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,801
of 81,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#194
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.