You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodological Underestimation of Oceanic Nitrogen Fixation Rates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012583 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wiebke Mohr, Tobias Großkopf, Douglas W. R. Wallace, Julie LaRoche |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 286 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 68 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 81 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 47 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2010.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#162,343
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,483
of 108,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#769
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.