↓ Skip to main content

Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010290.pub3
Authors

Nienke S Weiss, Elena Kostova, Marleen Nahuis, Ben Willem J Mol, Fulco van der Veen, Madelon van Wely

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,768,368
of 12,510,729 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,666
of 8,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,106
of 172,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,510,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.