↓ Skip to main content

DIVERSITY AND DIVERSIFICATION RESEARCH

Overview of attention for article published in Du Bois Review, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DIVERSITY AND DIVERSIFICATION RESEARCH
Published in
Du Bois Review, January 2019
DOI 10.1017/s1742058x18000267
Authors

Herbert J. Gans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#10,755,079
of 14,156,319 outputs
Outputs from Du Bois Review
#215
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,721
of 317,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Du Bois Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,156,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them