↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative epidural analgesia versus systemic analgesia for thoraco-lumbar spine surgery in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postoperative epidural analgesia versus systemic analgesia for thoraco-lumbar spine surgery in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012819.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Guay, Santhanam Suresh, Sandra Kopp, Rebecca L Johnson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 15 21%
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 37%
Unspecified 22 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,647,063
of 13,571,692 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,328
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,942
of 291,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,571,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.