You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aberrant enhancer hypomethylation contributes to hepatic carcinogenesis through global transcriptional reprogramming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-08245-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lei Xiong, Feng Wu, Qiong Wu, Liangliang Xu, Otto K. Cheung, Wei Kang, Myth T. Mok, Lemuel L. M. Szeto, Cheuk-Yin Lun, Raymond W. Lung, Jinglin Zhang, Ken H. Yu, Sau-Dan Lee, Guangcun Huang, Chiou-Miin Wang, Joseph Liu, Zhuo Yu, Dae-Yeul Yu, Jian-Liang Chou, Wan-Hong Huang, Bo Feng, Yue-Sun Cheung, Paul B. Lai, Patrick Tan, Nathalie Wong, Michael W. Chan, Tim H. Huang, Kevin Y. Yip, Alfred S. Cheng, Ka-Fai To |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 2 | 13% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,266,763
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#33,296
of 57,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,519
of 448,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#788
of 1,268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.