↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the perceptions of adolescents on graphic health warnings and plain packaging of cigarettes

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of the perceptions of adolescents on graphic health warnings and plain packaging of cigarettes
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0933-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Drovandi, Peta-Ann Teague, Beverley Glass, Bunmi Malau-Aduli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 44 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Unspecified 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 51 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#739,316
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#91
of 2,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,347
of 450,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.