↓ Skip to main content

Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillipa J Hay, Stephen Touyz, Angélica M Claudino, Sanja Lujic, Caroline A Smith, Sloane Madden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 17%
Psychology 19 13%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 43 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#656,190
of 16,109,142 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,743
of 11,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,091
of 338,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,109,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.