↓ Skip to main content

Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillipa J Hay, Stephen Touyz, Angélica M Claudino, Sanja Lujic, Caroline A Smith, Sloane Madden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Psychology 11 14%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#681,597
of 14,094,074 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,093
of 10,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,849
of 318,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,094,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.