You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
General practitioners and management of chronic noncancer pain: a cross-sectional survey of influences on opioid deprescribing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s168785 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth White, Chris Hayes, Allison W Boyes, Simon Chiu, Christine L Paul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 27% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,268,751
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#147
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,906
of 449,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#10
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.