↓ Skip to main content

Decoding Complex Chemical Mixtures with a Physical Model of a Sensor Array

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decoding Complex Chemical Mixtures with a Physical Model of a Sensor Array
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Tsitron, Addison D. Ault, James R. Broach, Alexandre V. Morozov

Abstract

Combinatorial sensor arrays, such as the olfactory system, can detect a large number of analytes using a relatively small number of receptors. However, the complex pattern of receptor responses to even a single analyte, coupled with the non-linearity of responses to mixtures of analytes, makes quantitative prediction of compound concentrations in a mixture a challenging task. Here we develop a physical model that explicitly takes receptor-ligand interactions into account, and apply it to infer concentrations of highly related sugar nucleotides from the output of four engineered G-protein-coupled receptors. We also derive design principles that enable accurate mixture discrimination with cross-specific sensor arrays. The optimal sensor parameters exhibit relatively weak dependence on component concentrations, making a single designed array useful for analyzing a sizable range of mixtures. The maximum number of mixture components that can be successfully discriminated is twice the number of sensors in the array. Finally, antagonistic receptor responses, well-known to play an important role in natural olfactory systems, prove to be essential for the accurate prediction of component concentrations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Engineering 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Computer Science 2 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2011.
All research outputs
#14,829,318
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,183
of 9,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,747
of 152,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#65
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.