You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Finding my ground in public health research: lessons from my Grandmother’s kitchen
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s5-s2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tanya Koolmatrie |
Abstract |
Research has a 'bad name' in Aboriginal communities. Too often, researchers have come, gathered information and taken it away from Aboriginal people, with no benefit for the communities taking part in the research. This history has implications for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal researchers planning research with Aboriginal communities. An in depth interview study will be conducted in one region of Victoria. Participants will be Aboriginal women who have had a baby within the previous five years. Processes that have been used in preparing to 'step out' into the community to conduct this research are the focus of the paper. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 7 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,457
of 17,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,064
of 246,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#106
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.