↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetric Cell Division as a Route to Reduction in Cell Length and Change in Cell Morphology in Trypanosomes

Overview of attention for article published in Protist, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Asymmetric Cell Division as a Route to Reduction in Cell Length and Change in Cell Morphology in Trypanosomes
Published in
Protist, January 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.protis.2007.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reuben Sharma, Lori Peacock, Eva Gluenz, Keith Gull, Wendy Gibson, Mark Carrington

Abstract

African trypanosomes go through at least five developmental stages during their life cycle. The different cellular forms are classified using morphology, including the order of the nucleus, flagellum and kinetoplast along the anterior-posterior axis of the cell, the predominant cell surface molecules and the location within the host. Here, an asymmetrical cell division cycle that is an integral part of the Trypanosoma brucei life cycle has been characterised in further detail through the use of cell cycle stage specific markers. The cell cycle leading to the asymmetric division includes an exquisitely synchronised mitosis and exchange in relative location of organelles along the anterior-posterior axis of the cell. These events are coupled to a change in cell surface architecture. During the asymmetric division, the behaviour of the new flagellum is consistent with a role in determining the location of the plane of cell division, a function previously characterised in procyclic cells. Thus, the asymmetric cell division cycle provides a mechanism for a change in cell morphology and also an explanation for how a reduction in cell length can occur in a cell shaped by a stable microtubule array.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 28%
Student > Bachelor 22 22%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 9 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,557,279
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Protist
#451
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,445
of 158,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protist
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.