You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of interventions to facilitate extubation in patients difficult-to-wean due to delirium, agitation, or anxiety and a meta-analysis of the effect of dexmedetomidine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-018-01289-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sébastien Dupuis, Dave Brindamour, Stephanie Karzon, Anne Julie Frenette, Emmanuel Charbonney, Marc M. Perreault, Patrick Bellemare, Lisa Burry, David R. Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| Canada | 6 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,750,868
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#208
of 2,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,909
of 446,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#14
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.